In fact, I met Dr Indiresan before taking the decision to introduce the machine everywhere. The Election Commission said we will hand over the machine for examination and they said they had their own machine built on the same pattern. Amarinder went on to say, "Excellent. I heard that more than 200,000-300,000 reams of paper used to be used in the elections. I noted it down and said I would call back in 10 minutes. So, I knew, barring some unforeseen incidents, the machine will deliver. But some states still have touchscreens and machines.In what was probably the shortest period for a Chief Election Commissioner to conduct a national election, I announced elections in end February 2004 after I had been appointed in early Feb. The first decision we had to take was on the machines – Electronic Voting Machines.01% of the machines, according to the voters, did not work. So, I have no hesitation in saying they are absolutely trustworthy. The Supreme Court said please prove the EVM can be doctored or tutored. He was an economist at that time, not a politician. For some states like Andhra and Orissa, where we held simultaneous elections, we needed more machines. I was among the very few at that time to boldly say that the machines are not to be questioned. The EVM is a simple machine." They were interested. It can never be hacked. Who is to be believed unless you have a CCTV.In America, this was introduced and then withdrawn. I now believe. A few months in advance we had informed them on the likely number of machines we would need — a stock of 10 lakh machines. An American had written that it is a blend of a calculator and a Casio musical instrument because of the placement of the buttons. People wanted to use them. As far as the machines are concerned, they have been certified, experimented, and trusted.Taruvai Subayya Krishnamurthy is a former IRS officer who served as 13th Chief Election Commissioner of India in 2004 - 2005. I agree there must have been some apprehension. The Pakistan Prime Minister whom I met at that time when I went to Pakistan, said, "Please see if it can be introduced in Pakistan.I was the CEC when I got a call from a politician, saying the machine was giving wrong results. This satisfies the voter, but in my opinion, it is a dangerous thing. But for that too, we have so many safeguards.When the results were announced, Prannoy Roy interviewed me at my home at 8 O’clock and asked me – "Are you nervous?" I asked, "Why, I am not contesting the elections. Then it was referred to a committee of engineers in DRDO. The biggest advantage of the machine is that you save a lot of paper. The machine is shifted before every election. Nobody can do anything unless you break open the machine, remove the old chip, put in a new chip and things like that. They were even questioned in the court and nothing happened. What are the safeguards in those machines, we asked. The machine was not immediately introduced because there is always apprehension associated with it. It is also available on the website and it removes many of the apprehensions of the people. And they produced a report saying they were absolutely trustworthy. I asked, "Sir, are you sure we will not get into trouble?" He said, "No. One of the safeguards is that in each booth, before starting the elections, the machine is tested in the presence of the party agents.

The chip that is put in the machine is burnt as soon as it is programmed as a calculator. It was found that the machine was not at fault. But we launched a huge campaign and our officers did a good job. The machines don’t lie. Hardly 0. Imran Khan was also there in a meeting when they had a workshop on conducting elections. The names of the candidates are stuck on the basis of alphabetical order. But with a CCTV the secrecy of the ballot is lost. Every state has a different system as America is a confederation. They have introduced VVPAT and still some parties will have complaints." I am not interested in any particular party. They have a Supreme Court. When you vote, a slip comes in an adjacent unit and the machine shows whom you have voted for. Then they didn’t open their mouths. We had a big campaign throughout the country — on bullock carts, in street corners, in schools and colleges and villages. If the machine is doing it, segregate it, replace with a new machine. I called my CEO and said please order an immediate enquiry. We will verify what the problem is. These are things that can be explained to a logical mind.I have been asked what with the current technology with which they are able to break in and hack into anything and I replied that the EVM is only a calculator. Some people say, I voted for X but Y has come. They have a separate election commission in each state and they follow their own rules. I want this machine to be sent to Delhi." They wanted VVPAT (Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail). Its cost was around Rs 300-400 (of one EVM). The results were excellent.If they are going to tally the machine count with the VVPAT, then how much time will it take to cover 1 million polling stations? Why are we complicating the system? If we have anything to suggest to improve the system, please do. The EVM had come to stay.Jayalalithaa and Amarinder Singh kept complaining. Then another Committee headed by Dr Indiresan of IIT. They cannot be tutored or doctored by any external source because it is not like a computer which can be accessed remotely.The famous Tamil writer Sujatha was also associated with the EVM as one of Embroidery machine parts the engineers.

They did deliver. The EVM is environment friendly, quick casting of votes and there are no invalid votes. It started during Seshan’s period. It is not an electronic instrument, it is just an instrument doing calculations. It will not respond to a remote control. The Election Commission has brought out a nice booklet on the EVM and how we developed it. I have always been saying the machines are credible, robust and reliable. In fact, American parliamentarians came and had a look at our machines and they were quite satisfied. In one constituency, one party may be on top and in another constituency, the same party may be at the bottom. Indiresan and the committee told me this and we went ahead and took a bold decision to use only EVMs. There is a story that an American sent a ball pen to space and it did not work but when a Russian sent a pencil, it worked. Their cases were dismissed and both of them got elected in the next elections. In my opinion, it should reach every media, every MP. It cannot be reused.The principal safety is the EVM cannot be hacked. None of them could find one. The government was never hesitant about allotting money. The machines are absolutely trustworthy. We took a bold decision to use them in all constituencies and contacted the manufacturers. The machines were made by a private company which had made huge donations to the then ruling party. One of the things we ensured is that the machine is not kept in one state forever. We had about 8 lakhs in hand and needed a standby of 2 lakhs. The credit goes to the engineers of Electronic Corporation of India, and Bharat Electronics. When someone tried a sophisticated machine, it did not work but when India tried something simple, it worked. Initially, they were sovereign powers and then they came together. And in every polling station, the list is in a different order. I had asked 40 electronic engineers to break open the machines and find a loophole. Within the machine, we have built a number of safeguards. Still some people questioned it and the issue went to the Supreme Court. So, they abandoned it. One of the important ingredients is that it has a chip and they started criticising the chip brought from Japan, whether it can be tutored. Machines are reliable.There was a remarkably warm reception for the machines. He had served in ECI as Commissioner from January 2000. I know political parties, including BJP questioned this.There are so many safeguards in the machine

Hide Comments | Add Comment